Neofitu Proposes "One Roof, Two Homes" Model for Cyprus Issue
DISY MP Averof Neofitu suggested that a solution to the Cyprus issue could be pursued through a "one roof, two homes" model, aiming for a swift resolution process. Speaking about his expectations for the Cyprus issue, Neofitu emphasized that the goal should be to explore this "one roof, two homes" style solution.
In an interview with Politis radio, Neofitu explained that the next steps in the Cyprus problem would likely involve an expanded conference scheduled for late February or early March. He noted that the outcome of this conference would determine whether a quick resolution process, or a definite deadlock, would occur. If a common desire among all parties is identified, negotiations would proceed on a fast track, moving quickly toward a resolution.
Neofitu pointed out that the era of endless negotiations was over, referring to Security Council decisions and UN Secretary-General reports that had long indicated that open-ended talks were no longer an option. "Let's be honest, there is no longer a Guterres framework, nor the possibility of a governance model like the one discussed in Crans Montana," he said.
He then outlined his proposal, suggesting an agreement that would establish two separate entities with a shared roof. One would be under the European Union's jurisdiction and the other under the United Nations, with free movement and full application of EU legislation across both entities. The two entities would have complete sovereignty and shared international representation.
Neofitu also addressed the long-standing division on the island, stating: "We have lived separately for 60 years, and every time a solution effort arises, instead of fearing a Turkish invasion, we worry about the potential solution. We are concerned about whether the de facto situation will change, but we are not worried about the occupation; we see the status quo as a form of stability and security."
Comments
Attention!
Sending all kinds of financial, legal, criminal, administrative responsibility content arising from illegal, threatening, disturbing, insulting and abusive, humiliating, humiliating, vulgar, obscene, immoral, damaging personal rights or similar content. It belongs to the Member / Members.